Friday, 29 November 2013
Thursday, 21 November 2013
FROM THE CROSS CHRIST REIGNED AS KING
The true
royalty of Jesus, which had nothing to do with the local, royal consciousness,
but was rooted in His Divine filiation, was expressed in His identification
with the reign of God. Consequently it
was not something He could claim during His public life because he knew well
that the royal consciousness was as much at work in the hearts of the victims
of the oppressive regimes as it was in the officials.
The people
wanted to declare, Jesus king, but not because He inaugurated among them the reign of God by preaching the
Good News to the poor, but because he seemed, in their eyes, a better version
of their earthly rulers. They wanted to replace the current institutional idols
with a new idol. As Jesus says to the crowds: “You seek me, not because you saw signs (that is not a locus of
Divine Revelation), but because you
ate your fill of the loaves.” Meaning: because you think that I could
fulfill your immediate material needs better than the current regime.)
Jesus
refused a royalty already corrupted by the royal consciousness, and functioned
only as a prophet. As a prophet he evoked the past, the Covenant God made with
the people in their poverty and their powerlessness, and He energized them to
hope for an alternative future. He
announced that the reign of God would belong to the poor, the meek, the hungry,
the dispossessed the powerless. It is a reign in which mutual love among equals
will replace all the hierarchical relationships built on inequality, the
relationship of power and domination which structured the society of the pagans
and oppressed the people of God.
Jesus
avoided identifying Himself publicly as a king until the moment when He was
beyond the corrupting reach of the royal consciousness in the people, as the
victim of the royal consciousness in the institution. When He was definitely involved in the
ultimate reversal that characterizes the divine reign, in the poverty and
powerlessness of death from which only God could rescue Him. THEN, He claimed
His royal identity. From the Cross He
reigned as King.
Adapted from: Sandra M. Schneiders, Cogregation of the Sisters, Servants
of the Imm. Heart of Mary
Wednesday, 13 November 2013
“GOD LOVES YOU AS YOU ARE”
One of the most often quoted
statements, and so often misunderstood, and explained is this: “God
loves you as you are.” That is very true. BUT, what is the truth? Does
it mean that God loves the drunkard and the criminal? HE certainly does. But,
it does not follow that HE wants, wishes them to remain living as they are.
Notwithstanding their weakness, God loves them just the same, and HE is constantly
watching them and showering on them “graces” as a means of curing them, of
saving them. BUT, and, it’s a big BUT, they must cooperate with those graces.
Read the life story of St.Matt Talbot.
For, what use is it throwing
life jackets, inflatable boats,ropes and what not to a drowning man, if the
poor chap does not try to catch hold of one of them and thus save himself ? You
might just as well send him a lifeboat or a helicopter, if the drowning man
does not make an effort, try to accept help, in other words cooperate, he is a
condemned man.
Reading, rather studying the
life of Saints, we realise this fact. God keeps ‘chasing’ man, like Francis
Thompson’s ‘Hound of Heaven’, not to bite him but to protect and save him. God
has a plan for each and every one of us, that has been drawn out since
eternity. God’s Divine Plan to lead me, Tony, to Him, is different from God’s
Plan for you, and for that matter, from all other’s.
Yes, God does take into
account my, should I call them, ‘characteristics’ ‘ingredients’ from which to produce the
tastiest, loveliest, most delicious cake. Those ingredients are all the
characteristics which make up my character, my good points, my defects, my
nervousness, my lethargy, my love for such and such a thing, my abilities, my
inabilities … my pros and cons. ALL these are taken into account by the Good
Shepherd, to shape, to change, to transform a rebellious, silly lamb into a
faithful one. The good potter breaks up the old clay pot and includes those
chippings in re-moulding a new pot. This was the system used in Christ’s days
on earth.
Could any one have imagined
a person so rough in character, a bully, so hyper, in today’s jargon, always
ready to be outspoken and challenge anyone who opposes him, or his friends …
such was that fisherman, who was anything but intellectual. I doubt it, if he
could read or write. Yet, God did transform him, re-moulded him, and ended up
as the leader of the Church, Saint Peter.
Yes, we have to let go,
trust HIM, and cooperate with His graces, and HE can make us all Saints. We are
not expected to be a photocopy of any Saint. I am unique, and so is God’s Plan
for me. One thing is needed … my cooperation.
Friday, 8 November 2013
AA-1025: The Memoirs of an Anti-Apostle
While working as a nurse in a Paris hospital in the late 1960s, a
nurse, by the name of Marie Carré claimed that a severely injured man,
who had a Slavic look, was brought in after being in a car accident.
Carré tried to communicate with the man to ask him some questions but he
didn't or couldn't respond. She even tried to get him to answer her
questions by blinking his eyes but he didn't. The man survived for a few
hours before he succumbed to his injuries. Having no form of
identification Carré was instructed to go through his belongings in
order to possibly identify him.
She did not succeed in
discovering his name, but she did discover in his briefcase a
100-page-typed memoir. She began reading the papers partly to find some
information to identify him and partly out of curiosity.
The memoir claimed that he was an undercover agent of the Soviet Union
ordered to infiltrate the Catholic Church by becoming a priest and to
put forth modernist ideas through a teaching position that would
undermine the main teachings of the Church during the Second Vatican
Council in subtle ways, by turn of phrase methods. The document gave
details and even told of a murder of a priest he had committed in order
to get his way. No one ever claimed his belongings and Carré eventually
decided to publish the memoir. It was printed in France in May 1972 and
eventually was translated into several other languages.
Catholic philosopher and theologian Alice von Hildebrand says that:
AA-1025 may be a literary invention of Marie Carre, but one must admit
that she hits the bull's eye from the first page to the last. Some
people have extraordinary talents to foresee the future. Carre certainly
had an extraordinary perception of how best to harm the Church. How
surprising indeed that all her [so-called] inventions have become
reality in the post-conciliar Church.
I suggest you get a copy of this book and read it well, rather, digest it. It should be read by all open-minded Catholics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)